Amid rising radical populism, attacks on electoral integrity, and the erosion of institutional checks and balances at the national level, a quieter story is unfolding in local governments and civic networks across the country. Years of research and interviews demonstrates that democratic resilience depends as much on the periphery—the everyday civic infrastructure of communities—as it does on the fate of central institutions.
Twenty years of research into Peru’s participatory institutions shows that despite deep political instability and corruption at the national level, participatory budgeting has strengthened accountability, boosted civic engagement, and improved residents’ well-being at the local level, offering hard-won lessons for today’s civic reformers.
Hundreds of thousands of legally eligible voters sit in local jails on any given day, yet logistical hurdles and bureaucratic confusion routinely deny them their right to vote in practice. Innovations and community-led efforts across the country are demonstrating that the lack of ballot access in jails is not an inevitability, but a solvable problem.
Subscribe for just $125 per year to receive both online access and a physical copy of the quarterly journal delivered straight to your mailbox.
Over 100,000 receive the National Civic Review each quarter. Its cases studies, reports, interviews and essays help communities learn about the latest developments in collaborative problems-solving, civic engagement, local government innovation and democratic governance. Some of the country’s leading doers and thinkers have contributed articles to this invaluable resource for elected officials, public managers, nonprofit leaders, grassroots activists, and public administration scholars seeking to make America’s communities more inclusive, participatory, innovative and successful.